Appeals Court Rules Against Fox in Netflix Poaching Dispute
The high-stakes case could establish whether studios can prevent their employees from leaving before their contracts expire. Fox accuses Netflix of poaching two employees, Marcos Waltenberg and Tara Flynn, in 2016. Netflix countersued, arguing that Fox should not be able to keep the employees against their will.
Attorneys for Fox asked a Los Angeles Superior Court judge to throw out the Netflix countersuit, arguing that it concerned protected speech under the California anti-SLAPP statute. The judge rejected the motion, causing Fox to appeal.
On Friday, a three-judge panel of the 2nd District Court of Appeal upheld the lower court’s ruling, deciding that the Netflix countersuit is not barred by the anti-SLAPP statute.
“In our independent judgment, Netflix’s cross-claims do not arise from Fox’s prelitigation communications or litigation activity,” Justice Lamar W. Baker wrote on behalf of a unanimous panel. “Rather, Netflix’s claims are predicated on Fox’s business practices related to the fixed-term agreements… Because we conclude Netflix’s claims do not arise from protected activity, we affirm the denial of the anti-SLAPP motion.”
Read more here.