Three “international businessmen” claim they were defamed by certain statements contained in one of the reports comprising the “Trump Dossier.”
Read MoreThe developer of the Dakota Access oil pipeline on Monday amended a $1 billion racketeering lawsuit it filed last August against three environmental entities after a federal judge criticized the original filing as vague and threatened to throw it out of court.
Read MoreA private prison contractor has threatened to sue the civil-rights activists mounting protests against it.
Read MoreThe California Supreme Court passed on actress Olivia de Havilland’s publicity rights challenge to an FX television show.
Read MoreA law firm was granted dismissal of tort claims under the MA anti-SLAPP law.
Read MoreA Texas attorney filed a $100 million lawsuit claiming he was fired from a law firm because of internet postings accusing him of being a “Nazi” and a “white supremacist.”
Read MoreIn February, several entities owned by Tavis Smiley sued the Public Broadcasting System, alleging that PBS’s public statements – that it had received multiple credible allegations of misconduct by Smiley and that it had conducted an investigation into those allegations – were false and defamatory, and led to the alleged cancellation of existing contracts and interference with future business relationships.
Read MoreA senior judge of the federal District Court for Eastern Arkansas, dismissed a SLAPP suit last week that was filed by Energy Transfer Partners a year ago that attempted to hold BankTrack, a Dutch environmental group, legally responsible for disrupting the progress of the Dakota Access pipeline.
Read MoreFormer Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore filed a lawsuit against several people and PACs who allegedly ran or contributed to misleading commercials against him during his unsuccessful bid for U.S. Senate.
Read MoreThe wife of a county official said she won’t let a “frivolous” defamation lawsuit filed against the couple by the Trumbull County engineer stop her from exercising her First Amendment right to free speech.
Read MoreA federal judge dismissed criminal racketeering claims against a nonprofit that wrote letters to banks asking them not to protest the Dakota Access Pipeline.
Read MoreIn a dispute between a former employee and former employer a judge denied the employee’s motion to dismiss under Massachusetts’ anti-SLAPP statute, finding that none of the employer’s claims were based solely on the employee’s petitioning activity.
Read MoreA North Texas attorney who claimed he was fired because of defamatory statements made about him will continue to pursue his lawsuit against the man who allegedly made the statements.
Read MoreIn the final post of a three-part series from guest contributor Leslie Paul Machado, Chair of LeClairRyan's Media, Internet and E-commerce Industry Team, Mr. Machado discusses the impact of these decisions on the legal landscape and the need for a federal anti-SLAPP law.
Read MoreIn the second post of a three-part series from guest contributor Leslie Paul Machado, Chair of LeClairRyan's Media, Internet and E-commerce Industry Team, Mr. Machado discusses the D.C. Circuit's decision on whether the D.C. anti-SLAPP statute can be used in federal diversity cases.
Read More