In the first post of a three-part series from guest contributor Leslie Paul Machado, Chair of LeClairRyan's Media, Internet and E-commerce Industry Team, Mr. Machado discusses the background of the D.C. anti-SLAPP statute.
Read MoreTwo news outlets filed a motion under Nevada’s anti-SLAPP law asking the lawyer of widow of a Metro Police Officer to pay their legal fees.
Read MoreAs doctors and hospitals throw considerable resources behind legal fights, some patients face huge legal bills for posting negative reviews.
Read MoreAn Attorney General is threatening a defamation lawsuit against the person who leaked a confidential memo detailing allegations that he groped four women.
Read MoreThe Democratic commissioner of the Dutchess County Board of Elections sued party members for defamation, claiming they are trying to prevent him from being recommended for reelection this fall.
Read MoreA woman said she was let go from ATTN: after protesting a racial slur from one of the news site's investors. A judge ruled that she is likely to prevail in her lawsuit.
Read MoreA lawsuit filed against S-Town’s creator, a senior producer for This American Life, accused the Peabody Award–winning podcast of exploiting its subject in life and following his death.
Read MoreMike Masnick at Techdirt discusses SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s opinion on anti-SLAPP laws.
Read MoreA woman sued an opposing side’s lawyer, claiming his blog post detailing the Snapchat lawsuit was defamatory. The lower court allowed the case to proceed, rejecting the lawyer’s anti-SLAPP motion. But the appeals court dismissed the case under Georgia’s anti-SLAPP law, finding there was no defamation and nothing written with actual malice.
Read MoreLeslie Machado provided an update on cases in which anti-SLAPP special motions to dismiss were filed. The cases were filed in D.C. federal court and D.C. Superior Court. Notably, the Superior Court stayed its case pending the resolution of a virtually-identical case in Ohio.
Read MoreA Vermont man sued a local newspaper for defamation, appealing the case to the Vermont Supreme Court. The paper challenged the lawsuit under Vermont's "anti-SLAPP" law.
Read MoreThe California Supreme Court issued a ruling in Hassell v. Bird, a case with serious ramifications for consumer speech.
Read MoreThe Baton Rouge television station WBRZ-TV faced a lawsuit for defamation from a former police officer, though the station’s attorney said the suit should be dismissed under Louisiana’s anti-SLAPP law.
Read MoreAn appeals court in California tossed a lawsuit filed against the San Francisco Chronicle by a now-disbarred lawyer who claimed the newspaper defamed him. The appeals court affirmed dismissal based on California’s anti-SLAPP law.
Read MoreAttorneys for 20th Century Fox asked a Los Angeles Superior Court judge to throw out a countersuit that Netflix filed against Fox. Fox said the countersuit should be thrown out because it concerned protected speech under the California anti-SLAPP statute, but the judge rejected the motion. Then a three-judge panel of the 2nd District Court of Appeal upheld the lower court’s ruling, deciding that the Netflix countersuit was not barred by the anti-SLAPP statute.
Read More