The California Supreme Court issued a ruling in Hassell v. Bird, a case with serious ramifications for consumer speech.
Read MoreA towing company sued a student in a $500,000 defamation lawsuit, claiming he allegedly disparaged the company online. The student had previously sued the company over a parking ticket.
Read MoreA Bigfoot-themed attraction in the Midwest filed a lawsuit over a TripAdvisor review left by a Kansas cattle farmer.
Read MoreA Manhattan woman posted a bad review of a local doctor online, and has spent close to $20,000 fighting the million-dollar lawsuit the doctor filed against her. The doctor accused her of defamation, libel, and causing emotional distress.
Read MoreA man who was in the business of buying and selling cars had difficulty getting the title to a vehicle he purchased in Louisiana, so he hired an Austin, Texas law firm to help. The law firm ultimately sued him over an online review he posted about the company.
Read MoreThe North American Olive Oil Association filed a lawsuit in Georgia state court against television personality Dr. Oz for statements he made regarding the authenticity of olive oil imported into the U.S. “The court has grave concerns that the motivation for the present action falls squarely within the purpose of the anti-SLAPP statute as an attempt to chill speech,” wrote Judge Alford Dempsey, Jr. The judge dismissed the suit.
Read MoreA company sued a Harvard researcher, claiming his studies cost the company millions of dollars in revenue. The company first tried to bring the lawsuit in Georgia, but later refiled the suit in federal court in Massachusetts, and there, the jury ruled in the researcher’s favor.
Read MorePresident Obama signed a number of bills into law on Thursday, most notably H.R. 5111, the “Consumer Review Fairness Act of 2016”. The legislation, which passed both houses of congress at the start of December, “makes certain clauses of a form contract void if it prohibits, or restricts, an individual from engaging in a review of a seller’s goods, services, or conduct.”
Read MoreA judge sided with a student who was sued for leaving a negative review of a law firm online, dismissing the defamation lawsuit and ordering the firm to pay her $26,831.55 in legal fees. The student’s lawyer successfully petitioned the court to have the lawsuit dismissed as a violation of Texas’s law against Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP).
Read MoreAfter more than a year of waiting, Congress has finally okayed a piece of legislation that, if signed by the president, will stop companies from using so-called “non-disparagement” or “gag” clauses to prevent or discourage customers from writing honest reviews.
Read MoreAmericans recently made their voices heard by electing a new president and Congress. Whether your candidate was elected or not, open, free and transparent elections are what make our democratic system function so smoothly. Another core principle of our democracy is the freedom to express an opinion without the threat of retaliation.
Read MoreTo stop consumer gag clauses and other practices known as strategic lawsuits against public participation, or SLAPP suits, state and federal legislators are moving toward laws specifically spelling out consumers’ rights to post negative, fact-based reviews.
Read MoreA Texas couple faced a lawsuit filed by their petsitter for $6,766 over a negative Yelp review. After that case was dropped, the petsitter re-filed the suit as a full-on defamation lawsuit seeking up to $1 million in damages. The couple asked the court to throw the entire case out because it should be prohibited by the Texas anti-SLAPP law.
Read MoreA Wyoming man requested to dismiss a lawsuit the Wyoming Lottery Corp. filed against him for allegedly trying to sabotage the corporation’s relationship with national lottery organizations. The man called the lawsuit a “SLAPP” suit.
Read MoreA flooring company brought a defamation lawsuit against a Colorado couple for negative reviews they left on Yelp. The parties eventually settled the suit, but the dispute cost the defendant $65,000 in legal fees.
Read More